[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Lindsay Burrell <lburrell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Need clear screenshots
From: Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 10:24:49 -0800
Cc: Framers List <framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, framers@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
In-reply-to: <KMEMKPAOBOEEHCFLLAGCEEJOCFAA.lburrell@convedia.com>
References: <LYRIS-139666-451803-2004.01.07-11.23.24--lburrell#convedia.com@lists.FrameUsers.com><KMEMKPAOBOEEHCFLLAGCEEJOCFAA.lburrell@convedia.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
If Snag-It can save as TIFF, do that and avoid all the other stupid steps! Personally, I do ALT-PrintScreen, create a new document in Photoshop, then CTRL-V to paste the screen copy into the new document. I then save as TIFF as appropriate. For my professional and personal work, I have not found that Snag-It or similar utilities provide any extra value for me. Others may find it convenient, especially if they don't have Photoshop or Photoshop Elements. BTW, I often convert the screen shot from standard RGB to indexed-RGB in Photoshop before saving as TIFF. This works OK for screen shots in which there are a limited number of colors used, such as in a dialogue box or menu; it does not work if you need a screen shot of an application with a complex image in it (such as a screenshot from Photoshop showing an open photographic image)! - Dov At 1/7/2004 10:12 AM, Lindsay Burrell wrote: >Dov, is the reason for putting the capture into Photoshop (rather than just >saving as TIFF from Snag-It (or Hypersnap, which we use) something to do >with the TIFF filter in Photoshop? Are there differences in TIFF filters? > >Thanks! >Lindsay * >-----Original Message----- >From: bounce-framers-139666@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:bounce-framers-139666@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Dov >Isaacs >Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:05 AM >To: Framers List >Cc: framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; framers@xxxxxxxxx >Subject: RE: Need clear screenshots > > >At 1/7/2004 08:57 AM, Steve Rickaby wrote: >>At 8:45 am -0800 7/1/04, Dov Isaacs wrote: >> >>>No, They are already crudded up! It is the process of compressing >>>them initially into JPEG that cruds them up. Putting them NOW into >>>TIFF won't help. >> >>As this issue, which is topical for me, has come up, how's this for a workflow? >> >>Capture -> Paint -> BMP -> Illustrator -> high quality TIFF >> >>Any problems with that for screenshots? >>-- >>Steve > > >Seems like way too many steps! > >First of all, you could use the BMP file as-is in FrameMaker, >although the file itself is not compressed. > >Secondly, Illustrator is not really an image-handling program. > >Third, better solution is: > >Capture=>Photoshop=>TIFF > >where "Photoshop" could be Photoshop Elements! > > - Dov ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx ** ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **